Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich. Read the opinion of the Court — 426 F. App'x 50
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 11, 2011·No. 08-4303·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 08-4303 _____________

TIMOTHY HANSON, Appellant

v.

SUPERINTENDENT MARTIN L. DRAGOVICH; *TOM CORBETT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA *(Pursuant to Rule 43(c), F. R. A. P.) ______________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Civ. Action No. 02-cv-00069) District Judge: Honorable Kim R. Gibson ______________

Argued on October 20, 2010 ______________

Before: HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed: February 1, 2011) ______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION ______________

It is hereby ORDERED that the attached amended opinion is to be substituted for the opinion filed on February 1, 2011. Because there is no substantive change to the opinion, the time for rehearing has already expired and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

By the Court,

/s/Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge Dated: April 11, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich, (3d Cir. 2011).

Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich (Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.