Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________
No. 08-4303 _____________
TIMOTHY HANSON, Appellant
v.
SUPERINTENDENT MARTIN L. DRAGOVICH; *TOM CORBETT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA *(Pursuant to Rule 43(c), F. R. A. P.) ______________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Civ. Action No. 02-cv-00069) District Judge: Honorable Kim R. Gibson ______________
Argued on October 20, 2010 ______________
Before: HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges
(Opinion Filed: February 1, 2011) ______________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION ______________
It is hereby ORDERED that the attached amended opinion is to be substituted for the opinion filed on February 1, 2011. Because there is no substantive change to the opinion, the time for rehearing has already expired and the mandate shall issue forthwith.
By the Court,
/s/Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge Dated: April 11, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich (Timothy Hanson v. Martin Dragovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.