Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten
This text of Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten (Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D21-3455 _____________________________
TIMOTHY GLYNN MCDONALD,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and HOLLY ANN OTTEN,
Appellees. _____________________________
On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. Garnett W. Chisenhall, Administrative Law Judge.
September 19, 2022
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
KELSEY, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Todd M. LaDouceur and Jay C. Hamilton of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, PLC, Pensacola, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Revenue; John Booth of Walborsky, Bradley & Fleming, PLLC, Pensacola, for Appellee Holly Ann Otten.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-glynn-mcdonald-v-department-of-revenue-and-holly-ann-otten-fladistctapp-2022.