Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 2022·No. 21-3455·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D21-3455 _____________________________

TIMOTHY GLYNN MCDONALD,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and HOLLY ANN OTTEN,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. Garnett W. Chisenhall, Administrative Law Judge.

September 19, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Todd M. LaDouceur and Jay C. Hamilton of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, PLC, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Revenue; John Booth of Walborsky, Bradley & Fleming, PLLC, Pensacola, for Appellee Holly Ann Otten.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten (Timothy Glynn McDonald v. Department of Revenue and Holly Ann Otten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.