Timothy E. Finley v. State of South Carolina

934 F.2d 318, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21586, 1991 WL 91400
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 1991
Docket90-6622
StatusUnpublished

This text of 934 F.2d 318 (Timothy E. Finley v. State of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy E. Finley v. State of South Carolina, 934 F.2d 318, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21586, 1991 WL 91400 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

934 F.2d 318
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy E. FINLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-6622.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 13, 1990.
Decided June 4, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-11-M)

Timothy E. Finley, appellant pro se.

Kurt Tavernier, Assistant City Solicitor, Greenville, S.C., for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Finley appeals from the district court's order denying his petition for removal to federal court of his prosecution under South Carolina law. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Finley v. South Carolina, CA-90-11-M (D.S.C. July 10, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chevy Chase, F.S.B. v. Hoffman (Ashby, Jr., Karen)
934 F.2d 318 (Fourth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
934 F.2d 318, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21586, 1991 WL 91400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-e-finley-v-state-of-south-carolina-ca4-1991.