Timothy Dexter Walton v. Buford Wade Jimmy How Taylor Gloria Wade Cliff Hapgood

983 F.2d 1059, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6242, 1993 WL 10865
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1993
Docket92-7165
StatusUnpublished

This text of 983 F.2d 1059 (Timothy Dexter Walton v. Buford Wade Jimmy How Taylor Gloria Wade Cliff Hapgood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy Dexter Walton v. Buford Wade Jimmy How Taylor Gloria Wade Cliff Hapgood, 983 F.2d 1059, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6242, 1993 WL 10865 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

983 F.2d 1059

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy Dexter WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Buford WADE; Jimmy How Taylor; Gloria Wade; Cliff
Hapgood, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-7165.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 30, 1992
Decided: January 21, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-441-R)

Timothy Dexter Walton, Appellant Pro Se.

Francis Howard Young, GREER & MELESCO, Rocky Mount, Virginia; William H. Fralin, Jr., WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jimmy How Taylor, Rocky Mount, Virginia; Gloria Wade, Rocky Mount, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Timothy Dexter Walton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walton v. Wade, No. CA-92-441-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1992).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant filed an informal brief in this Court which contained impertinent and possibly threatening statements. His brief was, therefore, stricken from the record in this case

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waid (James Carl, Jr.) v. Blankenship (w.d.)
983 F.2d 1059 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 F.2d 1059, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6242, 1993 WL 10865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-dexter-walton-v-buford-wade-jimmy-how-tayl-ca4-1993.