Timothy Dale Wood v. State

Opinion

!< I COURT OF/ \i- ti\!.,^ /Lis, Ca-Wv^?, V-msVc 121h Court nf ygqp;.^ ."Hxrriz; j dWK

~^<A Co^V C^t (JMavwxW IS-a.o.VMrc.

M5 Uu^k-X ^^0^2-^- -Cor -VW <kWv^ ia v*^ Wd wvfcoec> Vo \W \<wj*<> OVA \s\ (&c.\. *?>tA \V coc^S \o w^ u^^Wc)^c -VW^v-c o3^S ao Ccxse -&>«' iAnc)cr&\ooJ c^> wie. Cph\J ^ ^\e^t fc-V rn^ W>-i> vJ^cV. Vxc£ Cd^€L c£ -Hv.^ 0^c& O^W^ C^ftL. <^*\ GVo,nCCS C^- vWX^i»\C> ^4oa__ Oj^f<^A' "T^wV- ^ow "TOP +W_

Sorc^ \o W 'So cWA<lV5> . JU f*c^ ~\?*-W«- +W- Qo^V "for -Torcj-^c, ne6 5 Ooac) -C^ <^ ^^i^^^a

T-^ X Woe CLwcVo'bec) vv\<-^ ?ccAe. \t.^df \o v^o<^