Timothy C. Russell v. Suzanne Colette Landry Lyubimov

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMay 26, 2011
DocketE2010-02541-COA-R3-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Timothy C. Russell v. Suzanne Colette Landry Lyubimov (Timothy C. Russell v. Suzanne Colette Landry Lyubimov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timothy C. Russell v. Suzanne Colette Landry Lyubimov, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

TIMOTHY C. RUSSELL, v. SUZANNE COLETTE LANDRY LYUBIMOV

Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 2005-0674-1 Hon. Ben W. Hooper, II., Judge

No. E2010-02541-COA-R3-CV - FILED - MAY 26, 2011

Tenn. R. App. P.3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed.

H ERSCHEL P ICKENS F RANKS, P.J., C HARLES D. S USANO, J R., J., and D. M ICHAEL S WINEY, J.

Timothy Russell, Hixson, Tennessee, pro se.

Dennis C. Campbell, Sevierville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Suzanne Colette Landry Lyubimov.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

On May 2, 2011, a show cause order was entered in this case, directing appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant

1 The Court of Appeals' Rules provide:

Rule 10. Memorandum Opinion

(b) This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated "MEMORANDUM OPINION," shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case. responded to the show cause order, but the argument in the response does not establish good cause for maintaining this case in this court. The Order entered by the Trial Judge on November 8, 2010, demonstrates that there are issues yet to be resolved in the Trial Court before a Tenn. R. App. P. 3, appeal will lie. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and the cost of the appeal is assessed to Timothy C. Russell.

PER CURIAM

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Timothy C. Russell v. Suzanne Colette Landry Lyubimov, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-c-russell-v-suzanne-colette-landry-lyubimo-tennctapp-2011.