Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2016·No. 05-16-00550-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 7, 2016

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00550-CV

TIMOTHY BROOKS, Appellant

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13646

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 6, 2016 pro se “Motion to Withdrawal of

Counsel.” Appellant is represented in this appeal by attorney Alex L. Davis III. To withdraw as

counsel, Mr. Davis must file a motion to withdraw that complies with rule of appellate procedure

6.5. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s pro se motion.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Davis, counsel

for appellant, counsel for appellee, and appellant at beco@att.net.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.