Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Order entered October 7, 2016
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00550-CV
TIMOTHY BROOKS, Appellant
V.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13646
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 6, 2016 pro se “Motion to Withdrawal of
Counsel.” Appellant is represented in this appeal by attorney Alex L. Davis III. To withdraw as
counsel, Mr. Davis must file a motion to withdraw that complies with rule of appellate procedure
6.5. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s pro se motion.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Davis, counsel
for appellant, counsel for appellee, and appellant at beco@att.net.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Timothy Brooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.