Timothy Albert Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Timothy Albert Harris v. State

DecidedMarch 13, 2015

DocketA15A1002

StatusPublished

This text of Timothy Albert Harris v. State (Timothy Albert Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timothy Albert Harris v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 12, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1002. HARRIS v. THE STATE.

Appellant in the above-referenced case was convicted following a jury trial, and his trial counsel timely filed a notice of appeal on December 19, 2014. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant’s counsel, who like appellant’s trial counsel is an employee of the DeKalb County Public Defender’s Office, determined that appellant has a claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel, requiring the appointment of conflict-free counsel. Consequently, appellant has now filed a motion with this Court, seeking a remand of this case to the trial court so that conflict-free appellate counsel can be appointed and the trial court can conduct an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s ineffective-assistance claim. Given these circumstances, our practice is to remand the case for appointment of conflict-free counsel and an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s ineffective- assistance claim. See, e.g., Hung v. State, 282 Ga. 684, 685 (2) (653 SE2d 48) (2007); Potter v. State, 272 Ga. 430, 432 (3) (530 SE2d 725) (2000). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this case be remanded to the trial court so that conflict-free counsel can be appointed and the court can conduct an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. It is further ordered that if the trial court finds that appellant was denied effective assistance of trial counsel, appellant shall be entitled to a new trial; however, if the trial court finds that appellant was not denied effective assistance of trial counsel, then appellant will be entitled to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of any such adverse order. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/12/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 12, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1002. HARRIS v. THE STATE.

Appellant in the above-referenced case was convicted following a jury trial, and his trial counsel timely filed a notice of appeal on December 19, 2014. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant’s counsel, who like appellant’s trial counsel is an employee of the DeKalb County Public Defender’s Office, determined that appellant has a claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel, requiring the appointment of conflict-free counsel. Consequently, appellant has now filed a motion with this Court, seeking a remand of this case to the trial court so that conflict-free appellate counsel can be appointed and the trial court can conduct an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s ineffective-assistance claim. Given these circumstances, our practice is to remand the case for appointment of conflict-free counsel and an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s ineffective- assistance claim. See, e.g., Hung v. State, 282 Ga. 684, 685 (2) (653 SE2d 48) (2007); Potter v. State, 272 Ga. 430, 432 (3) (530 SE2d 725) (2000). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this case be remanded to the trial court so that conflict-free counsel can be appointed and the court can conduct an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. It is further ordered that if the trial court finds that appellant was denied effective assistance of trial counsel, appellant shall be entitled to a new trial; however, if the trial court finds that appellant was not denied effective assistance of trial counsel, then appellant will be entitled to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of any such adverse order. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/12/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Timothy Albert Harris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-albert-harris-v-state-gactapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack