Timothy Aaron Rivers v. State
This text of Timothy Aaron Rivers v. State (Timothy Aaron Rivers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ February 24, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15A1009. TIMOTHY AARON RIVERS v. THE STATE.
On November 21, 2011, Timothy Rivers pled guilty to the offense of failure to register as a sex offender. He subsequently filed various pro se motions, including a motion for an out-of-time appeal. The trial court denied the motion for an out-of-time appeal on July 22, 2013. Rivers did not appeal that ruling. Instead, he filed a “second” pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal on June 30, 2014. The trial court dismissed this motion, finding it was a renewed motion of the one previously ruled upon by the court.1 Rivers filed this direct appeal from that ruling. We lack jurisdiction. Although a criminal defendant may directly appeal from a trial court order denying his request for an out-of-time appeal, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of an appealable order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). Thus, if Rivers had filed a timely appeal from the July 22, 2013 order denying his initial motion for an out-of-time appeal, we would have accepted the direct appeal. However, as the trial court indicated, Rivers’ subsequent motion for an out-of-time appeal is merely a renewal of his original motion. In essence, it is a motion for reconsideration of the original order. And the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not directly appealable and does not extend the time for appealing the underlying judgment. Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). Rivers’ November 3, 2014 notice of appeal, therefore, is untimely as to the July 22, 2013 order denying his motion for an out-of-time appeal and invalid as to the order denying his “second”
1 Neither the original motion for out-of-time appeal nor the court’s order denying the original motion have been included in this direct appeal. motion for out-of-time appeal requesting the court to reconsider his first motion. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 02/24/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Timothy Aaron Rivers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-aaron-rivers-v-state-gactapp-2015.