Timothy a Stoepker v. Attorney Discipline Board
This text of Timothy a Stoepker v. Attorney Discipline Board (Timothy a Stoepker v. Attorney Discipline Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 21, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh 149105 & (3)(4)(5) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra TIMOTHY A. STOEPKER, Bridget M. McCormack Plaintiff, David F. Viviano, Justices
v SC: 149105 ADB: 13-000032-GA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD, Defendant. ________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs or fees to either party. The earlier-filed motions to expedite and for immediate consideration are denied as moot.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 21, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Timothy a Stoepker v. Attorney Discipline Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timothy-a-stoepker-v-attorney-discipline-board-mich-2014.