Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 2015·No. 151311·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 9, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

151311 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

TIMOTHY A. CARL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 151311 COA: 319017 Muskegon CC: 12-048776-CZ MUSKEGON COUNTY, MARK BURNS, TODD GILCHRIST, THERESA JONES-BURTON, BRIAN BONSTELL, LEONARD BETHKE and BRENDAN BOWEN, Personal Representatives of the Estate of CHRISTY BOWEN, DARRYL HAIRSTON, JASON CERKA, RICHARD TOPP, SCOTT SMITH, DEAN ROSELER as Muskegon County Sheriff and Individually, and STEVEN J. WEINERT, Defendants,

and

KATHERINE A JAWOR, D.O., Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 9, 2015

a1202

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County, (Mich. 2015).

Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County (Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.