Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 9, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
151311 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
Joan L. Larsen,
TIMOTHY A. CARL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,
v SC: 151311 COA: 319017 Muskegon CC: 12-048776-CZ MUSKEGON COUNTY, MARK BURNS, TODD GILCHRIST, THERESA JONES-BURTON, BRIAN BONSTELL, LEONARD BETHKE and BRENDAN BOWEN, Personal Representatives of the Estate of CHRISTY BOWEN, DARRYL HAIRSTON, JASON CERKA, RICHARD TOPP, SCOTT SMITH, DEAN ROSELER as Muskegon County Sheriff and Individually, and STEVEN J. WEINERT, Defendants,
and
KATHERINE A JAWOR, D.O., Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
December 9, 2015
a1202
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County (Timothy a Carl v. Muskegon County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.