Timonere v. State

666 So. 2d 197, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13226, 1995 WL 750665
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1995·No. No. 95-00122·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

James Timonere was convicted of racketeering, trafficking, and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. On an earlier occasion we reversed his sentence and remanded for resen-tencing within the guidelines. Timonere v. State, 631 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). The current appeal arises from resentencing. Timonere contends that the trial court failed to abide by our mandate by stacking minimum mandatory terms of imprisonment. We agree that such stacking was inappropriate and we remand for resentencing pursuant to Barry v. State, 654 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Remanded.

THREADGILL, C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timonere v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13226, 1995 WL 750665 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

666 So. 2d 197 (Timonere v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fannin v. State
751 So. 2d 158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)