Timms v. State

765 So. 2d 852, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2000 WL 1160452
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 16, 2000
DocketNo. 4D00-2474
StatusPublished

This text of 765 So. 2d 852 (Timms v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timms v. State, 765 So. 2d 852, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2000 WL 1160452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. See Battle v. State, 761 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). This affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to seek administrative relief on the issue of his gain time claim. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2000).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battle v. State
761 So. 2d 1177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Clements v. State
761 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
765 So. 2d 852, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2000 WL 1160452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timms-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.