Timms v. State

765 So. 2d 852, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2000 WL 1160452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2000·No. No. 4D00-2474·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. See Battle v. State, 761 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). This affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to seek administrative relief on the issue of his gain time claim. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2000).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timms v. State, 765 So. 2d 852, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374, 2000 WL 1160452 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 852 (Timms v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Battle v. State
761 So. 2d 1177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Clements v. State
761 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)