Timms v. Douthit
This text of Timms v. Douthit (Timms v. Douthit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-10732 Document: 00516533895 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 20-10732 Summary Calendar FILED November 4, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Paul D. Timms, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Christian Douthit, Medical Doctor,
Defendant—Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:20-CV-67
Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Paul D. Timms, Texas prisoner # 1564883, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. We review the district court’s denial of IFP status for an abuse of discretion. See Flowers v. Turbine Support Div., 507 F.2d 1242, 1244
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-10732 Document: 00516533895 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2022
No. 20-10732
(5th Cir. 1975), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in Thompson v. Drewry, 138 F.3d 984, 985-86 (5th Cir. 1998). The district court’s determination that Timms was financially ineligible to proceed IFP was not based on arbitrary or erroneous grounds. See Flowers, 507 F.2d at 1244. Given the deposits and balances in Timms’s inmate trust account during the months preceding the initiation of his § 1983 action, the district court’s ruling does not represent an abuse of discretion. See id. AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Timms v. Douthit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timms-v-douthit-ca5-2022.