Timmons v. Timmons

Missouri Court of Appeals

Timmons v. Timmons

506 S.W.3d 357, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1011, 2016 WL 5888583

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 11, 2016

DocketWD 79389

StatusPublished

This text of 506 S.W.3d 357 (Timmons v. Timmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timmons v. Timmons, 506 S.W.3d 357, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1011, 2016 WL 5888583 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Roscoe Timmons appeals the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Rinda Timmons. He argues the trial court erred in dissolving the marriage because it did not have jurisdiction to do so because the parties’ pleadings averred they were not yet separated, which husband claims fails to comply with the statutory requfre-ments of a petition for dissolution of marriage. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Roscoe Timmons appeals the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Rinda Timmons. He argues the trial court erred in dissolving the marriage because it did not have jurisdiction to do so because the parties’ pleadings averred they were not yet separated, which husband claims fails to comply with the statutory requfre-ments of a petition for dissolution of marriage. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 S.W.3d 357, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1011, 2016 WL 5888583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timmons-v-timmons-moctapp-2016.