Timmons v. Security Savings Bank

299 U.S. 503, 57 S. Ct. 15
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 12, 1936·No. No. 109·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U. S. 326, 332; Doty v. Love, 295 U. S. 64.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timmons v. Security Savings Bank, 299 U.S. 503, 57 S. Ct. 15 (1936).

299 U.S. 503 (Timmons v. Security Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Lms Holding Company
50 F.3d 1526 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.
789 P.2d 1272 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)
Cook v. Tompkins
713 S.W.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Driver v. Van Cott
257 So. 2d 541 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Bank of New York v. United States
314 F. Supp. 1167 (S.D. New York, 1970)
Estate of Cohn v. United States
249 F. Supp. 763 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Hoblitzell v. Howard
96 A.2d 446 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Singer's Estate
161 F.2d 15 (Second Circuit, 1947)
Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Hofheimer's Estate
149 F.2d 733 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Budnik v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank
44 N.E.2d 298 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1942)
Welch v. Terhune
126 F.2d 695 (First Circuit, 1942)
Chickering v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
118 F.2d 254 (First Circuit, 1941)
Mellon v. Driscoll
117 F.2d 477 (Third Circuit, 1941)
Adriance v. Higgins
113 F.2d 1013 (Second Circuit, 1940)
United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.
113 F.2d 194 (Tenth Circuit, 1940)