Timmons v. Records Access Officer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Timmons v. Records Access Officer

271 A.D.2d 320, 706 N.Y.S.2d 640, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4365

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 320 (Timmons v. Records Access Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timmons v. Records Access Officer, 271 A.D.2d 320, 706 N.Y.S.2d 640, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 16, 1999, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the petition seeking disclosure of certain documents pursuant to Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Freedom of Information Law), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner failed to meet his burden to supply the information required to retrieve the requested documents (see, Mitchell v Slade, 173 AD2d 226, lv denied 78 NY2d 863; Matter of Wattenmaker v New York State Employees’ Retirement Sys., 95 AD2d 910, lv denied 60 NY2d 555). Concur — Williams, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 16, 1999, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the petition seeking disclosure of certain documents pursuant to Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (Freedom of Information Law), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner failed to meet his burden to supply the information required to retrieve the requested documents (see, Mitchell v Slade, 173 AD2d 226, lv denied 78 NY2d 863; Matter of Wattenmaker v New York State Employees’ Retirement Sys., 95 AD2d 910, lv denied 60 NY2d 555). Concur — Williams, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 320, 706 N.Y.S.2d 640, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timmons-v-records-access-officer-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack