Timmons v. Keys

1947 OK 320, 185 P.2d 901, 199 Okla. 305, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 685
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 21, 1947·No. No. 32550·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on May 1, 1946, he filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. Defendant has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Durham v. Brown, 164 Okla. 139, 24 P. 2d 295, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but this court may reverse and remand the cause, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate the judgment rendered for the defendant and enter judgment for the plaintiff foreclosing his lien and to fix a reasonable attorney’s fee for plaintiff.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timmons v. Keys, 1947 OK 320, 185 P.2d 901, 199 Okla. 305, 1947 Okla. LEXIS 685 (Okla. 1947).

1947 OK 320 (Timmons v. Keys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durham v. Brown
1933 OK 396 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)