Timmerman v. Timmerman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Timmerman v. Timmerman

154 S.W.3d 532, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2005 WL 287163

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Timmerman v. Timmerman. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1074 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 2005·No. No. WD 63185·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donna Timmerman appeals from the judgment dissolving her marriage to Emil Phillip Timmerman. She contends the trial court erred in awarding the parties joint legal and physical custody of their children and in granting Mr. Timmerman the substantial majority of the parenting time. Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in the custody determination and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Mem[519]*519orandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donna Timmerman appeals from the judgment dissolving her marriage to Emil Phillip Timmerman. She contends the trial court erred in awarding the parties joint legal and physical custody of their children and in granting Mr. Timmerman the substantial majority of the parenting time. Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in the custody determination and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Mem[519]*519orandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Timmerman v. Timmerman, 154 S.W.3d 532, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2005 WL 287163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

154 S.W.3d 532 (Timmerman v. Timmerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.