Timmerman v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Timmerman v. Board of Education

272 A.D.2d 1075

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1075 (Timmerman v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timmerman v. Board of Education, 272 A.D.2d 1075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

While the complaint is framed as an action for a declaratory judgment, in the first two causes of action plaintiff seeks to recover additional salary allegedly due pursuant to salary schedules adopted by defendants, as required by sections 883 and 889 of the .Education Law. By the third cause of action plaintiff seeks to recover additional salary allegedly due pursuant to section 245 of the Military Law. Defendants’ motion to change the venue from Westchester County to Kings County was denied, and defendants appeal. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The action is one against public officers for an official act or omission within the meaning of subdivision 2 of section 184 of the Civil Practice Act, and must be tried in Kings County, where it arose. Hagarty, Acting P. J,, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

While the complaint is framed as an action for a declaratory judgment, in the first two causes of action plaintiff seeks to recover additional salary allegedly due pursuant to salary schedules adopted by defendants, as required by sections 883 and 889 of the .Education Law. By the third cause of action plaintiff seeks to recover additional salary allegedly due pursuant to section 245 of the Military Law. Defendants’ motion to change the venue from Westchester County to Kings County was denied, and defendants appeal. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The action is one against public officers for an official act or omission within the meaning of subdivision 2 of section 184 of the Civil Practice Act, and must be tried in Kings County, where it arose. Hagarty, Acting P. J,, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timmerman-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1947.