Timley v. State
This text of 215 S.E.2d 735 (Timley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this prosecution for robbery by sudden snatching, the state’s evidence established all of the elements of this crime. The defendant relied on alibi as a defense. Therefore, under the evidence, the defendant could only be guilty as charged or not guilty of any offense whatsoever. This being so, the lesser included offense of theft by taking was not raised by the evidence and it was not error to fail to charge the jury on this lesser crime as a possible verdict. Hill v. State, 229 Ga. 307 (191 SE2d 58); Hinton v. State, 127 Ga. App. 108 (192 SE2d 717).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 S.E.2d 735, 134 Ga. App. 727, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timley-v-state-gactapp-1975.