Timken Roller Bearing v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 273 U.S. 665 (Timken Roller Bearing v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
273 U.S. 665
47 S.Ct. 454
71 L.Ed. 829
TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING COMPANY, plaintiff in error,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,* and Thomas P. GOODBODY, as Receiver of the Hydraulic Steel Company, plaintiff in error, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.
Nos. 168, 178.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 28, 1927
Messrs. Luther Day and Rufus S. Day, both of Cleveland, Ohio (Donald W. Kling, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Andrew Squire, Thomas M. Kirby and Andrew P. Martin, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in this Court on the authority of Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. Almeida, 265 U. S. 104, 105, 44 S. Ct. 449, 68 L. Ed. 932, and Oliver American Trading Co. v. United States of Mexico, 264 U. S. 440, 442, 44 S. Ct. 390, 68 L. Ed. 778.
Dismissal set aside 274 U. S. 181, 47 S. Ct. 550, 71 L. Ed. —.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 U.S. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timken-roller-bearing-v-pennsylvania-railroad-scotus-1926.