Timis v. Young
Opinion
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 00-232
2001 MT 63A
JIM TIMIS and CONNIE TIMIS, both individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, CHARDEE TIMIS,
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v.
MARK YOUNG, JOHN YOUNG and ROSE YOUNG, d/b/a ROSE'S DAY CARE, Defendants and Respondents.
ORDER
On April 27, 2001, appellants filed herein a petition for rehearing, and on May 4, 2001, respondents filed their objection thereto. The Court having considered the same,
IT IS ORDERED that the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of this Court's opinion dated April 18, 2001, is hereby amended to read: "Later, the Timises repudiated the agreement and refused to sign the settlement documents."
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm
DATED this 15th day of May, 2001.
/S/ KARLA M. GRAY
/S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART
/S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER
/S/ JAMES C. NELSON
/S/ JIM REGNIER
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2001 MT 63 (Timis v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.