Timis v. Young
Opinion
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
No. 00-232
2001 MT 63A
______________
JIM TIMIS and CONNIE TIMIS, both
individually and on behalf of their minor
daughter, CHARDEE TIMIS,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
MARK YOUNG, JOHN YOUNG and
ROSE YOUNG, d/b/a ROSE'S DAY CARE,
Defendants and Respondents.
ORDER
On April 27, 2001, appellants filed herein a petition for rehearing, and on May 4, 2001, respondents filed their objection thereto. The Court having considered the same,
IT IS ORDERED that the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of this Court's opinion dated April 18, 2001, is hereby amended to read: "Later, the Timises repudiated the agreement and refused to sign the settlement documents."
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm
DATED this 15th day of May, 2001.
/S/ KARLA M. GRAY
/S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART
/S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER
/S/ JAMES C. NELSON
/S/ JIM REGNIER
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2001 MT 63 (Timis v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.