Timis v. Young

2001 MT 63
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Timis v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 305 Mont. 18
Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 2001·No. 00-232·Published

Opinion

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 00-232

2001 MT 63A

______________

JIM TIMIS and CONNIE TIMIS, both

individually and on behalf of their minor

daughter, CHARDEE TIMIS,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

MARK YOUNG, JOHN YOUNG and

ROSE YOUNG, d/b/a ROSE'S DAY CARE,

Defendants and Respondents.

ORDER

On April 27, 2001, appellants filed herein a petition for rehearing, and on May 4, 2001, respondents filed their objection thereto. The Court having considered the same,

IT IS ORDERED that the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of this Court's opinion dated April 18, 2001, is hereby amended to read: "Later, the Timises repudiated the agreement and refused to sign the settlement documents."

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm

DATED this 15th day of May, 2001.

/S/ KARLA M. GRAY

/S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART

/S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER

/S/ JAMES C. NELSON

/S/ JIM REGNIER

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timis v. Young, 2001 MT 63 (Mo. 2001).

2001 MT 63 (Timis v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.