Time Warner City Cable v. Tri State Auto, Inc.

5 A.D.3d 153, 772 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2240
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 5 A.D.3d 153 (Time Warner City Cable v. Tri State Auto, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Time Warner City Cable v. Tri State Auto, Inc., 5 A.D.3d 153, 772 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered August 30, 2002, which denied defendant Tri State Auto’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

By waiving its equitable claims and retaining only its contract cause of action, plaintiff met the sum-certain requirement for default judgment under CPLR 3215 (a) (cf. Geer, Du Bois & Co. v Scott & Sons Co., 25 AD2d 423 [1966]). Plaintiff had acquired jurisdiction over Tri State by service pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 306, and Tri State failed to raise a nonconclusory factual issue warranting a traverse hearing (see Chinese Consol. Benevolent Assn. v Tsang, 254 AD2d 222 [1998]). With the insufficiency of its jurisdictional challenge, Tri State was required to set forth both a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense (Perez v Villa Josefa Realty Corp., 293 AD2d 306 [2002]). Tri State’s failure to set forth a reasonable excuse rendered it unnecessary for the court to consider whether there was a meritorious defense (see Ortiz v Santiago, 303 AD2d 1, 6 [2003]). Denial of vacatur was a provident exercise of the court’s discretion.

[154]*154We have considered Tri State’s other contentions, several of which are improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Century Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Rickenbacker
2026 NY Slip Op 50222(U) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
U.S. Equities Corp. v. Chaplin
77 Misc. 3d 127(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
U.S. Equities Corp. v. Tan
73 Misc. 3d 147(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Milonis v. 3273-3285 Westchester Ave. Realty Corp.
70 Misc. 3d 136(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Voulkoudis v. Frantzeskakis
2020 NY Slip Op 3597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Technical Career Inst. v. Clerveaux
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020
U.S. Equities Corp. v. Tsui
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
U.S. Equities Corp. v. Ruiz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Citibank, N.A. v. K.L.P. Sportswear, Inc.
2016 NY Slip Op 7413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Stephan B. Gleich & Associates v. Gritsipis
87 A.D.3d 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Admiral Insurance v. Marriott International, Inc.
79 A.D.3d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Pacinello v. Cohen
39 A.D.3d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Estrella v. Herrera
23 A.D.3d 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Pires v. Ortiz
18 A.D.3d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
116th Street Realty Partnership v. City of New York
18 A.D.3d 226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Hyundai Corp. v. Republic of Iraq
20 A.D.3d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 153, 772 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/time-warner-city-cable-v-tri-state-auto-inc-nyappdiv-2004.