Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Timberman v. State

Timberman v. State

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 276
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Timberman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 844 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 1923·No. No. 17589·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, J.i

Where evidence included in a question consists of several items, part admissible and part objectionable, and an objection is interposed to the question generally without pointing out the -particular item which is objectionable, it is not reversible error to overrule the objection and admit the question as a whole.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timberman v. State, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 276 (Ohio 1923).

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 276 (Timberman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.