Timberlake v. Cassidy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Timberlake v. Cassidy

1 La. App. 636, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 105

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 18, 1925

DocketNo. 4094

StatusPublished

This text of 1 La. App. 636 (Timberlake v. Cassidy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Timberlake v. Cassidy, 1 La. App. 636, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 105 (La. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLIOTT, J.

This suit is in all respects like that entitled: Mrs. Stella Mallet Timberlake and Husband vs. E. R. Cassidy, No. 4052, appealed from the same court and based on the same law and facts.

For the reasons assigned in the case mentioned and this day decided it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment appealed from herein be and the same is hereby affirmed, the defendant and appellant to pay the cost in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELLIOTT, J.

This suit is in all respects like that entitled: Mrs. Stella Mallet Timberlake and Husband vs. E. R. Cassidy, No. 4052, appealed from the same court and based on the same law and facts.

For the reasons assigned in the case mentioned and this day decided it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment appealed from herein be and the same is hereby affirmed, the defendant and appellant to pay the cost in both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 La. App. 636, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timberlake-v-cassidy-lactapp-1925.