Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. James Driscoll and Carol Driscoll

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 18, 2022
Docket12-22-00064-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. James Driscoll and Carol Driscoll (Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. James Driscoll and Carol Driscoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. James Driscoll and Carol Driscoll, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NO. 12-22-00064-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TIMBER LAKE ESTATES PROPERTY § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

JAMES DRISCOLL AND CAROL DRISCOLL, APPELLEES § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc., filed a notice of appeal on April 1, 2022. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Timber Lake’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time appeal was perfected. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. On April 5, this Court requested that Timber Lake file a docketing statement within ten days if it had not already done so. Timber Lake did not file the docketing statement as requested. On April 21, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice advising Timber Lake that the docketing statement was past due. The notice provided that unless the docketing statement was filed on or before May 2, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement has passed, and Timber Lake has not complied with the Court’s request. Because Timber Lake failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (after giving ten days’ notice, appellate court may dismiss appeal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time). Opinion delivered May 18, 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

2 COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 18, 2022

TIMBER LAKE ESTATES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant V. JAMES DRISCOLL AND CAROL DRISCOLL, Appellees

Appeal from the 173rd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV17-0093-3)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. James Driscoll and Carol Driscoll, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/timber-lake-estates-property-owners-association-inc-v-james-driscoll-and-texapp-2022.