Tim Lingenfelter v. John Stoebner

188 F. App'x 554

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This long-running litigation, which stretches back to the early 1990s, was brought to an end by the district court’s 1 May 24, 2005, judgment, entered upon the court’s May 23, 2005, order, dismissing the complaint.

Having considered the parties’ arguments, we conclude that, for the reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive, well-reasoned opinion, 2 the judgment should be, and it hereby is, affirmed. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. 3

1 . The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

2 . Lingenfelter v. Stoebner, No. 03-CV-5544, 2005 WL 1225950 (D.Minn. May 23, 2005).

3 . We exercise our discretion not to impose on our own motion damages or costs upon appellants under Fed. R.App. P. 38.