Tim Lingenfelter v. John Stoebner

Eighth Circuit

Tim Lingenfelter v. John Stoebner

188 F. App'x 554

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 2006

Docket05-2796

StatusUnpublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 188 F. App'x 554 (Tim Lingenfelter v. John Stoebner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tim Lingenfelter v. John Stoebner, 188 F. App'x 554 (8th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This long-running litigation, which stretches back to the early 1990s, was brought to an end by the district court’s 1 May 24, 2005, judgment, entered upon the court’s May 23, 2005, order, dismissing the complaint.

Having considered the parties’ arguments, we conclude that, for the reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive, well-reasoned opinion, 2 the judgment should be, and it hereby is, affirmed. See *555 8th Cir. Rule 47B. 3

1

. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

2

. Lingenfelter v. Stoebner, No. 03-CV-5544, 2005 WL 1225950 (D.Minn. May 23, 2005).

3

. We exercise our discretion not to impose on our own motion damages or costs upon appellants under Fed. R.App. P. 38.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI