Tim James McMahan v. Brendan W. Guy and Stephen Tyler

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 20, 2020
Docket13-20-00435-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Tim James McMahan v. Brendan W. Guy and Stephen Tyler (Tim James McMahan v. Brendan W. Guy and Stephen Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tim James McMahan v. Brendan W. Guy and Stephen Tyler, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00435-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TIM JAMES MCMAHAN, Appellant,

v.

BRENDAN W. GUY AND STEPHEN TYLER Appellee.

On appeal from the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Tim James McMahan, attempts to appeal an order on special

exceptions and a plea to the jurisdiction. On October 28, 2020, upon review of the notice

of appeal, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that it appeared the appeal was not

timely perfected. The clerk informed appellant that the defect should be corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the court’s letter, or the appeal would be dismissed.

In his response to the clerk’s notice, appellant informed the court that he did not

receive a copy of the signed orders until September 17, 2020; furthermore, appellant filed

a document entitled Error Coram Nobis and Brief in Support at the trial court, in an

apparent attempt to establish the time that he received notice of the order. The Court

construes that filing as a motion contemplated by Tex. R. Civ. P. 306a(5). See Tex. R.

Civ. P. 306a(4),(5).

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial

court for further proceedings in accordance with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 306a. The

trial court is directed to forward a supplemental clerk’s record, including any orders

rendered, and a supplemental reporter’s record, if such is necessary, to the Court within

thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to notify the Court within such period indicating

a date by which the trial court can comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th day of November, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tim James McMahan v. Brendan W. Guy and Stephen Tyler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tim-james-mcmahan-v-brendan-w-guy-and-stephen-tyler-texapp-2020.