Tilzer v. Tilzer

417 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28602
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1982
DocketNo. 81-1882
StatusPublished

This text of 417 So. 2d 777 (Tilzer v. Tilzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tilzer v. Tilzer, 417 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28602 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment is affirmed with regard to the finding of undue influence. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971), aff’d after remand, 289 So.2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Quinn v. Phipps, 93 Fla. 805, 113 So. 419 (1927); Lee v. Patton, 359 So.2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 367 So.2d 1125 (Fla.1979).

The remaining points raised on appeal lack merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Carpenter
289 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
In Re Estate of Carpenter
253 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Quinn v. Phipps
113 So. 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Lee v. Patton
359 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilzer-v-tilzer-fladistctapp-1982.