Tilus v. Holder
This text of Tilus v. Holder (Tilus v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1907
DADLY TILUS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 23, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Dosa-Wea Neufville, III, MORAISNEUFVILLE LAW FIRM, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant Director, Jeffery R. Leist, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dadly Tilus, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order,
which denied Tilus’ motion to remand his case to the immigration
judge. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order, and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008); Jean v.
Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Tilus (B.I.A. July 18, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tilus v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilus-v-holder-ca4-2009.