Tilton v. Fairmount Lodge A. F. & A. M.
This text of 149 Ill. App. 530 (Tilton v. Fairmount Lodge A. F. & A. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Inasmuch as neither party objected or excepted to the report of the master, they are concluded thereby so far as his findings of fact are concerned. Imp. Co. v. Whitehead, 128 Ill. 279; Matthews v. Whitehorn, 220 Ill. 36; Jones v. Crary, 234 Ill. 26.
As to his conclusions of law no objections or exceptions were necessary to enable them to question the propriety thereof. Gillett v. T. & T. Co., 230 Ill. 373.
The general rule is that a mistake of law, pure and simple, is not adequate ground for relief. 2 Pomeroy’s Eq. Jur., sec. 842. If an agreement is what it was intended to be, equity will not interefere with it, because the parties have mistaken its legal effect and import. Ibid, sec. 845.
Upon applying the foregoing rule to the facts as found by the special master, by which both parties are concluded, it is apparent that the chancellor erred in not dismissing the bill on the hearing for want of equity. The decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 Ill. App. 530, 1909 Ill. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilton-v-fairmount-lodge-a-f-a-m-illappct-1909.