Tilton v. Corning
This text of 28 A. 17 (Tilton v. Corning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“ Writs and proceedings in civil actions shall not be made returnable before a justice of the peace within any town *148 or city having a police court.” G. L., c. 215, s. 7. “ Police coiu’ts have . . . exclusive cognizance of all crimes and offences committed within the town in which such court is established, so far hs justices of the peace have jurisdiction.” G. L., c. 252, s. 8. Under the act of 1885 (e. 94, s. 5), an inquiry concerning alleged corrupt practices in an election is made by “ any justice of the peace, or police judge.” The inquisition is not an ordinary criminal prosecution, but a process of discovery, like a coroner’s inquest. “Any justice of the peace and quorum shall have and exercise the same powers ... as a coroner.” G. L., c. 265, s. 2. It has not been understood that the authority of a justice of the peace and quorum to act as a coroner is limited to towns in which there is no police court. There are reasons for inferring that the legislature intended an election inquest might be conducted in any town by a justice-of the peace. The police court of Littleton has not exclusive jurisdiction in this case.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A. 17, 66 N.H. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilton-v-corning-nh-1889.