Tilton v. Condright

Supreme Court of Delaware

Tilton v. Condright

1 Del. Cas. 637

DecidedMarch 15, 1814

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 637 (Tilton v. Condright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tilton v. Condright, 1 Del. Cas. 637 (Del. 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

Per [Curiam]. Johns, C. J.

A majority of the Court think the evidence admissible and that it explains, without contradicting, the record.

(Note. Chief Justice Johns contra, [I] understood that R. Cooper and Davis admitted the testimony.)

Chief Justice Johns’ charge. This cause turns on the point whether a tenant for a determinate period is compellable to give notice to the landlord of his” intention to quit and give up the premises at the end of the term. We all hold not. He has fulfilled his contract and need not go beyond it by giving notice.

Verdict for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per [Curiam]. Johns, C. J.

A majority of the Court think the evidence admissible and that it explains, without contradicting, the record.

(Note. Chief Justice Johns contra, [I] understood that R. Cooper and Davis admitted the testimony.)

Chief Justice Johns’ charge. This cause turns on the point whether a tenant for a determinate period is compellable to give notice to the landlord of his” intention to quit and give up the premises at the end of the term. We all hold not. He has fulfilled his contract and need not go beyond it by giving notice.

Verdict for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Del. Cas. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilton-v-condright-del-1814.