Tilton Ex Rel. State v. City of Stuart

Supreme Court of Florida

Tilton Ex Rel. State v. City of Stuart

114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 646, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 791

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 14, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is p.o error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is p.o error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.

Tilton Ex Rel. State v. City of Stuart, 114 So. 383, 94 Fla. 646, 1927 Fla. LEXIS 791 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

114 So. 383 (Tilton Ex Rel. State v. City of Stuart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.