Tillson v. Crim
This text of 22 Ind. 357 (Tillson v. Crim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Complaint for a new trial, filed after the term at which a trial was had. '
The grounds for a new trial are, surprise at the trial and newly discovered evidence. The complaint was demurred to, the demurrer was sustained, and the complaint dismissed.
The statute provides that, “ where causes for a new trial are discovered after the term at which the verdict or decision was rendered,” &e.
If the causes are discovered during the term, the motion for a new trial must be made during the term; and where [358]*358the application for a new. trial is made after the term the complaint must show that the causes were discovered after the term or it will be bad on demurrer. 2 GL & II. p. 215, and note.
In the case at bai’, the complaint alleged “that since the trial of said cause the plaintiff has ascertained,” &c., but has no allegation that the discovery was made since or after the term, &c.
The decision below is right, and is affirmed with costs.
The judgment is affirmed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ind. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillson-v-crim-ind-1864.