Tillson v. Crim

22 Ind. 357
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 Ind. 357 (Tillson v. Crim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillson v. Crim, 22 Ind. 357 (Ind. 1864).

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Complaint for a new trial, filed after the term at which a trial was had. '

The grounds for a new trial are, surprise at the trial and newly discovered evidence. The complaint was demurred to, the demurrer was sustained, and the complaint dismissed.

The statute provides that, “ where causes for a new trial are discovered after the term at which the verdict or decision was rendered,” &e.

If the causes are discovered during the term, the motion for a new trial must be made during the term; and where [358]*358the application for a new. trial is made after the term the complaint must show that the causes were discovered after the term or it will be bad on demurrer. 2 GL & II. p. 215, and note.

H. Craven, W. B. Pierce and II. Zb Thompson, for the appellant. John Davis, for the appellee.

In the case at bai’, the complaint alleged “that since the trial of said cause the plaintiff has ascertained,” &c., but has no allegation that the discovery was made since or after the term, &c.

The decision below is right, and is affirmed with costs.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shigley v. Snyder
45 Ind. 543 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ind. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillson-v-crim-ind-1864.