Tillson v. Benschoter

75 N.W. 1101, 55 Neb. 443, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 594
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 23, 1898
DocketNo. 8191
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 N.W. 1101 (Tillson v. Benschoter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillson v. Benschoter, 75 N.W. 1101, 55 Neb. 443, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 594 (Neb. 1898).

Opinion

Habbison, C. J.

In this, an appeal from the .confirmation of a judicial sale of property under an order of sale to enforce a decree of foreclosure of a real estate mortgage, it is complained by appellant, the mortgagor and alleged to be still an owner of an interest in a portion of the mortgaged property, that (1) a copy of the appraisement, together with written applications for and certificates of liens, were not filed in the office of the clerk of the district court before the advertisement of the sale; (2) the property was situate in the city of Kearney, and no application was made to the city treasurer for a certificate of liens; (3) there was no notice to the appellant that the appraisement would be made or had been made. That applications for or certificates of liens were not made or filed was not an objection to confirmation of the sale of any avail to appellant. (See Hamer v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co., 52 Neb. 705; Smith v. Foxworthy, 39 Neb. 214; Craig v. Stevenson, 15 Neb. 362; La Flume v. Jones, 5 Neb. 257.) Moreover, the property sold for a sum in excess of two-thirds of the gross valuation placed on it by the appraisers, and if deductions of liens were made and the record did not disclose the applications for and certificates of the liens, there was no prejudice to the rights of the complainant, and nothing for which the sale should be set aside. (Miller v. Lanham, 35 Neb. 886.) The ap-praisement is a part of the proceedings in the action of which there is no requirement of special notice to the defendant. (Smith v. Foxworthy, 39 Neb. 214; Iowa Loan & Trust Co. v. Stimpson, 53 Neb. 536.) It follows that the decree of the district court must be

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mallory v. Estate of Fitzgerald
95 N.W. 601 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Maginn v. Pickard
78 N.W. 295 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 N.W. 1101, 55 Neb. 443, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillson-v-benschoter-neb-1898.