Tillman v. Thrasher

61 Ga. 15
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 20, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 Ga. 15 (Tillman v. Thrasher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillman v. Thrasher, 61 Ga. 15 (Ga. 1878).

Opinion

Jackson, Justice.

Joseph Tillman, the proprietor of the Quitman Reporter, made application to the superior court of Brooks county, for a mandamus nisi against the sheriff of that county, to show cause why he should not publish his official advertisements in that newspaper, on the ground that when he changed it to the Free Press, another newspaper in Brooks county, he had not given notice of the contemplated change in the Quitman Reporter. The judge refused the mandamus nisi, and this is the error complained of.

While §3650 of the Code does require the notice to be given, we think that the applicant’s remedy is by an action for damages, if he can prove any, and if he has any right or remedy at all. Certainly we know of no law which will entitle him to make the ■ sheriff by mandamus change the advertising back into his newspaper.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. Southland Publishing Co.
150 S.E.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Dollar v. Wind
70 S.E. 335 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Ga. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillman-v-thrasher-ga-1878.