Tillman v. State
361 S.W.3d 441, 2011 WL 5921451
Opinion
ORDER
Marshall Tillman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Tillman claims that the motion court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Tillman contends that trial counsel failed to specifically and contemporaneously object to the testimony of the current medical examiner who testified regarding the conclusions that a former medical examiner reached about the cause of death of the victim. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tillman v. State, 361 S.W.3d 441, 2011 WL 5921451 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
361 S.W.3d 441 (Tillman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Burnett
361 S.W.3d 441 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)