Tillman v. State

108 S.E. 116, 27 Ga. App. 184, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 768
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1921
Docket12376
StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 116 (Tillman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillman v. State, 108 S.E. 116, 27 Ga. App. 184, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 768 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case does not authorize the verdict. It was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. A. S. Bradley, for plaintiff in error. I. W. Rountree, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 116, 27 Ga. App. 184, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillman-v-state-gactapp-1921.