Tillman v. State
419 So. 2d 804, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21271
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tillman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 466 So. 2d 20 →
Opinion
The contentions properly reviewable on these direct appeals are without merit. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(d)(3); State v. Tait, 387 So.2d 338 (Fla.1980); McNamara v. State, [805]*805357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978). Hence, the convictions are affirmed, without prejudice, however, to the subsequent consideration of a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion based upon alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel or any other appropriate ground.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tillman v. State, 419 So. 2d 804, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21271 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
419 So. 2d 804 (Tillman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McNamara v. State
357 So. 2d 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
State v. Meneses
392 So. 2d 905 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
State v. Tait
387 So. 2d 338 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)