Tillman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tillman v. State

186 So. 2d 257, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5343

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1966

DocketNo. 6851

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 2d 257 (Tillman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tillman v. State, 186 So. 2d 257, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. Appellant’s motion failed to allege that he was indigent and unable to employ counsel at the time he entered his plea. The motion was therefore legally insufficient. Hoffman v. State, 163 So.2d 797 (D.C.A.Fla.1964), and cases cited therein.

The order appealed is therefore affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile his motion.

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI