Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

240 A.D. 895

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside and vacate an ex parte order vacating a warrant of attachment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, 240 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 895 (Tillman v. Russo-Asiatic Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.