Tillman v. City of Slidell

464 So. 2d 986, 1985 La. App. LEXIS 8368
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 14, 1985·No. No. CA 84 1445·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LOTTINGER, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee, Clarence Tillman, filed a motion to dismiss the defendant-appellant’s suspensive appeal and convert same into a devolutive appeal because an appeal bond was not filed.

Plaintiff-appellee contends that La.R.S. 13:45811 is applicable to municipal boards and commissions only and not to the municipalities themselves.

Though La.R.S. 13:4581 only refers to boards and commissions, this statute has been given a broad interpretation so as to include public bodies generally. See City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., [987] Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 217, 80 So. 260 (1918); Lambert v. Labruyere, 151 So.2d 377 (La.App. 4th Cir.1963).

Therefore, for the above and foregoing reasons, the defendant-appellant, City of Slidell, is exempt under La.R.S. 13:4581 from furnishing a suspensive appeal bond, and plaintiff-appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal is denied at plaintiffs costs.

DENIED

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tillman v. City of Slidell, 464 So. 2d 986, 1985 La. App. LEXIS 8368 (La. Ct. App. 1985).

464 So. 2d 986 (Tillman v. City of Slidell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rome v. Traylor
620 So. 2d 1163 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)