TILLMAN, LARRY JOSEPH Jr.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2016
DocketWR-84,555-02
StatusPublished

This text of TILLMAN, LARRY JOSEPH Jr. (TILLMAN, LARRY JOSEPH Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TILLMAN, LARRY JOSEPH Jr., (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,555-02

EX PARTE LARRY JOSEPH TILLMAN, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1059831-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to life imprisonment. His case was affirmed by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in

Tillman v. State, No. 14-08-00846-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 27, 2010). On

October 5, 2011, this Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.

On July 24, 2012, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed Applicant’s conviction on remand.

Applicant contends that counsel failed to notify him that the Fourteenth Court of Appeals 2

affirmed his conviction on remand. Applicant contends he was denied the opportunity to file a

second petition for discretionary review (PDR).

Counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court stating that his file is incomplete due to an

office move and does not reflect if and when Applicant was notified of the appellate court’s decision.

Counsel also states that he notified the Fourteenth Court of Appeals that he would be filing a second

PDR, but was informed that Applicant would be appointed new counsel. Applicant was not

appointed new counsel.

The trial court made no recommendation. We conclude that there was a breakdown in the

system. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find, therefore, that

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the

judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-08-00846-CR that affirmed his

conviction in Cause No. 1059831 from the 262nd District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall

file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: May 25, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TILLMAN, LARRY JOSEPH Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillman-larry-joseph-jr-texcrimapp-2016.