Tillinghast v. Clark

Seventh Circuit

Tillinghast v. Clark

201 F. 81, 119 C.C.A. 419, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1912

DocketNo. 1,877

StatusPublished

This text of 201 F. 81 (Tillinghast v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tillinghast v. Clark, 201 F. 81, 119 C.C.A. 419, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000 (7th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

KOHLSAAT. Circuit Judge.

This writ of error is sued out to reverse so much of the judgment of the lower court as allows to the defendant in error herein a credit upon the cause of action brought before this court in No. 1,878 (201 Fed. 77), wherein the parties hereto are reversed, based upon partial failure of consideration for the promissory note there involved.

For the reasons set out in the opinion filed in said former cause, this cause is also affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KOHLSAAT. Circuit Judge.

This writ of error is sued out to reverse so much of the judgment of the lower court as allows to the defendant in error herein a credit upon the cause of action brought before this court in No. 1,878 (201 Fed. 77), wherein the parties hereto are reversed, based upon partial failure of consideration for the promissory note there involved.

For the reasons set out in the opinion filed in said former cause, this cause is also affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 F. 81, 119 C.C.A. 419, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillinghast-v-clark-ca7-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack