Tillinghast v. Clark

Seventh Circuit

Tillinghast v. Clark

201 F. 81, 119 C.C.A. 419, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 8, 1912·No. No. 1,877·Published

Opinion

KOHLSAAT. Circuit Judge.

This writ of error is sued out to reverse so much of the judgment of the lower court as allows to the defendant in error herein a credit upon the cause of action brought before this court in No. 1,878 (201 Fed. 77), wherein the parties hereto are reversed, based upon partial failure of consideration for the promissory note there involved.

For the reasons set out in the opinion filed in said former cause, this cause is also affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KOHLSAAT. Circuit Judge.

This writ of error is sued out to reverse so much of the judgment of the lower court as allows to the defendant in error herein a credit upon the cause of action brought before this court in No. 1,878 (201 Fed. 77), wherein the parties hereto are reversed, based upon partial failure of consideration for the promissory note there involved.

For the reasons set out in the opinion filed in said former cause, this cause is also affirmed.

Tillinghast v. Clark, 201 F. 81, 119 C.C.A. 419, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000 (7th Cir. 1912).

Pincite

201 F. 81 (Tillinghast v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related