Tilli v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co.

107 A. 330, 263 Pa. 558, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 473
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 17, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 56
StatusPublished

This text of 107 A. 330 (Tilli v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tilli v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 107 A. 330, 263 Pa. 558, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 473 (Pa. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This action was brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. At the threshold of the trial below plaintiff undertook to show by the first two witnesses called that when the decedent was killed the defendant company was engaged in interstate commerce, but their testimony was just to the contrary. The tunnel in which he was working when struck by a train was not used at all by the defendant in the business of interstate commerce, and the judgment of nonsuit could not have been withheld: Hench v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 246 Pa. 1; Mayers v. Union R. R. Co., 256 Pa. 474.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hench v. Pennsylvania Railroad
91 A. 1056 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Mayers v. Union Railroad
100 A. 967 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A. 330, 263 Pa. 558, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilli-v-philadelphia-reading-ry-co-pa-1919.