Tilley v. State

282 S.W. 1118, 104 Tex. Crim. 173, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 761
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 7, 1926·No. No. 10053.·Published

Opinion

*174 MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment was not attacked; nor is there complaint of the rulings of the court upon the admission and rejection of evidence.

The store of M. N. Brown was burglarized and property taken therefrom. The written confession of the appellant specifically admits the commission of the crime, giving the details, and among other things, the name of the person to whom he sold a part of the stolen property. The purchaser testified as a witness corroborating the confession; and there were also other corroborating circumstances.

Perceiving nothing in the record which warrants a reversal of the judgment, an affirmance is ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilley v. State, 282 S.W. 1118, 104 Tex. Crim. 173, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 761 (Tex. 1926).

282 S.W. 1118 (Tilley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.