Tilley v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Tilley v. Cobb

57 N.W. 799, 56 Minn. 295, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 25, 1894

DocketNo. 8400

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 57 N.W. 799 (Tilley v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tilley v. Cobb, 57 N.W. 799, 56 Minn. 295, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 N.W. 799, 56 Minn. 295, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tilley-v-cobb-minn-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack