Tilley v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Tilley v. Cobb

57 N.W. 799, 56 Minn. 295, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 25, 1894·No. No. 8400·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Tilley v. Cobb, 57 N.W. 799, 56 Minn. 295, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

57 N.W. 799 (Tilley v. Cobb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related