Tillery v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

157 A.2d 455, 221 Md. 627, 1960 Md. LEXIS 456
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJanuary 21, 1960
DocketP. C. No. 52
StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.2d 455 (Tillery v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tillery v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 157 A.2d 455, 221 Md. 627, 1960 Md. LEXIS 456 (Md. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner seeks leave to appeal from the denial of relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, Code (1959 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, secs. 645A et seq.

The application is denied for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Manley in the trial court, and for the further reason herein below as to the one novel contention made by the applicant.

This novel contention is that the Federal Narcotics Law has pre-empted the field and bars State prosecutions for narcotics violations. It is unnecessary at this time to go into questions which this contention might present further than to point out that Section 198 of Title 21, U. S. Code, seems to negative any possible foundation for the contention. That Section provides, inter alia, for cooperation between Federal and State officials in narcotics prosecutions in State courts and [628]*628thereby clearly shows that the Congress had no intention of pre-empting the field, even if it might do so.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 198
21 U.S.C. § 198

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 A.2d 455, 221 Md. 627, 1960 Md. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tillery-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1960.